This Sermon Gets an "F"
I once heard noted theologian R. C. Sproul describe a sermon he heard as a high schooler that covered Jesus’ feeding of the 5,000. The sermon’s punchline was that there was not really any miracle at all because Jesus manipulated circumstances to make the event appear supernatural.
This is how he allegedly did it. There was a large cave behind the site of Jesus’ planned sermon, and the day before the big event, Jesus and his disciples secretly stashed food in the cave so they could bring it out to simulate a miracle. The key to this trick was Jesus’ robe with its long flowing sleeves. At just the right moment, Jesus stood in front of the cave-turned-pantry while the disciples secretly slipped food up the back of his robe and out through his sleeves. Voila! A miracle!
In my book That’s a Great Question: What to Say When Your Faith Is Challenged, I describe five mental filters used by people who don’t really believe the Bible to make it say what they wish it said. One of the filters that subtracts from the Bible is the Filter of Antisupernaturalism, which states that since miracles can’t happen, there must be a naturalistic explanation.
This sermon’s preposterous theory clearly falls into this category and suffers from three fatal flaws:
Besides gutting the story of any miraculous content, it also ignores an important detail recorded in Mark 6:41: Jesus gave just the five loaves and two fish – and not all the food for the thousands – to the disciples. So apparently the miracle took place as the disciples distributed the food to the crowd. The “all the food slipped up through Jesus’ robe” theory contradicts the text and feeds into the next flaw.
Pulling this off would require absurdly laughable logistics. How long would it have taken for all the food to come up through Jesus’ robe? Remember, there were 5,000 men and an untold number of women and children – probably 10,000+ in total. Imagine catering a fish and bun luncheon for over 10,000 people! How many hours would it take for literally thousands of food items to pass through Jesus’ sleeves? As stated above, what really happened is that the disciples fanned out to feed the thousands, multiplying the “distribution channels” and greatly reducing the time required.
Also, how could the disciples have bought and paid for all that food and carted it up to the cave – undoubtedly requiring many trips – undetected? Getting such huge quantities at one time would certainly have been noticed, allowing onlookers to blow the whistle on the alleged but false miracle.
The most serious flaw, though, is that, if that pastor is right, Jesus is a despicable deceiver. One of the most famous theological propositions of the 20th Century is C. S. Lewis’ “trilemma” in which he states that since Jesus clearly claimed to be God, you have only three choices:
He was God – in which case you’d better acknowledge him in your life
He wasn’t God but didn’t know it – in which case he was insane
He wasn’t God and he knew it – in which case he was a liar and a fraud
Since this ridiculous theory was proposed by a mainline Protestant minister, he presumably bears some allegiance to Jesus or else he would have chosen a different career path. I can’t know for sure what he thought of Jesus, but my guess is that he would have considered him a great inspirational teacher and someone to emulate. Unfortunately, according to Lewis, that option is not open. Why should you trust someone that blatantly deceptive? We’re forced to select one of the three possibilities Lewis offers.
Think about it. Instead of being able to embrace Jesus in all his deity, this minister would rather deny the miraculous and relegate Jesus to the company of tricksters and conmen. Is that a Jesus you want to worship?
So, I give this sermon an “A” in creativity, a “C+” in fidelity to the biblical text, and an “F” in theology.
My message to you is, don’t blindly accept every “take” on Jesus you hear, even if it comes from an allegedly respectable source.